Individual Entry

Brass Knuckle Blogs



Useful Links









Add to Technorati Favorites

[Valid RSS]

NucleusCMS
Nucleus CMS v3.24



template by i-marco's choice

Dynamic Drive

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS


Put Your Clothes On

by: Dark Wraith

The story at AlterNet, reported by astrea here at Big Brass Blog, claims researchers have found that men's brains respond to scantily clad women much the same way those men respond to objects. Although for the purposes of the present post I shall let the essential findings go unchallenged, I would be remiss not to make passing note that more than a few issues make this "research" suspect (and I use the word in scare quotes to clearly indicate that it is nothing more than fluff stuff for publish-or-perish desperadoes of academia to get journal publications in their vitae).

The quality of what qualifies anymore as empirical science aside, the issue du jour seems to center around female breasts — specifically, large female breasts — and how "men" (apparently, the implication is all men) go "bikini brained" when they see them.

I need to take exception and a bit of umbrage.

No, big-breasted females do not impress me. I had a mother. Now that I am all grown up, I don't need to live in post-fetal dependence upon the biological milk jugs of a surrogate, particularly if those cans would require a five-dollar return deposit if they were made of glass in a recycling-conscious municipality or state.

More broadly, I have reached a glad age and a happy state of general irritability wherein sexual games of taunt-and-tease annoy me to no end.

I have seen all I need to see, and there is nothing new under the sun... at least there's nothing new I want to see and keep my groceries in my stomach. (That's why the link to man-on-dwarf a friend sent me was the last straw in our e-mail communications.)

Years ago, I was a practicing nudist. That's right: a practicing nudist. In fact, for a while I was on the board of directors of a local group. Indeed, I was the member-at-large. Anymore, I have enough credentials that I need not list that distinction on my curriculum vita. However, in my time attending nudist parks and get-togethers, I saw just about everything from very big to very small, and quite a bit of sun-baked human-beef jerky. While large-breasted women were not uncommon, my attention was generally more focused on such matters as cold-nosed dogs, waist-high nettles, and the occasional agony of in-the-raw bacon-frying, challenging as it is when hot grease pops off the griddle and onto easily blistered man-parts.

Nudist clubs can be instructional. I learned not to care, and it wasn't all because of the over-exposure to over-exposed women. You see, my local club had as one of its members a fellow from the Islands. He was relatively tall, muscular, but lanky. He was also graced by the Lord with what qualified in my book as deformity. Even when he was approaching from behind, I could hear him 20 feet away: "SLIK-slik, SLIK-slik, SLIK-slik..." I wearied quickly of this sound. I also wearied quickly of the women who would look straight ahead while their eyes rotated 360 degrees in their sockets as that fool sauntered by. He knew damned well God liked him more.

With a passion, I do so hate competitive sports.

Nudist clubs were not, however, where I completed my journey into annoyance with nudity.

I'm a college teacher.

Even in this day and age, when kids come to college from high schools and earlier training where they got abstinence-only nonsense beaten into them year in and year out, their hormones are still in high gear. The boys are ready to have sex (and only a select group does on a regular basis), and the girls are ready to have no limits on how far they can experiment with their allure, although many are not nearly as much into sex as they are their ability to capture attention of males by appearing to be as interested as the boys are. In warmer weather, attention-getting rituals mean seeing all manner of attire that could easily kill an older man not prepared for the spectacle that seems to get a little more daring every year. Last Summer was the first in my memory when butt cheeks were showing with no attempt at covering the meat-leg junction.

Cleavage has been on display for several years now, and there's not much more on the top side that can be revealed without more design engineering advances in up-lifting bras.

The slightly warmer weather has revealed a new trend for this year: skin-tight pants that look like a cross between panty-hose and spray-on paint. I think there's a thong involved in some way, but Lord knows how it's positioned, considering the anatomical gallery these things put on display.

It will get worse, this year, I can tell you that. Spring Break follies in Florida aside, sun bathing on roofs and in front of off-campus apartments will be fashion shows of bikinis that are little more than two Bandaids and a cork.

And the young men will be right there, too, trying their best to show their own wares: six-pack abs are the goal, and quite a few more young men these days strive for them. The boys pretend not to care that the girls pretend not to look; but everybody is checking everybody out.

Except for me. I just get irritated with the whole meat aisle.

If I want to see boobs, I'll watch C-Span interviews with politicians. Ditto if I want to see ass. Just like the girls who flop their undulating mammary glands, and just like the guys who twitch their over-wrought ab and man-tit muscles, the people we elect want us to look, and given that my tax dollars are paying for those boobs and asses in Washington, I'll take the opportunity to get my money's worth. Unlike when I had to suffer the elephant trunk guy at my nudist club, who routinely made me feel like Mr. Pony on the Mr. Ed Show, there is no chance at all that the people in Washington will challenge my sense of self-worth and, indeed, my very reason for living.

To finish this post, though, yes, many men do go all bikini-brain when they see generously inflated female breasts and supple, tender buttocks; but my contention that the same is true of women when they look at men should not go unchallenged, so I herewith offer a bit of a test.

Several years ago, I did a fund-raiser for a fellow blogger. I called it The Dark Wraith He-Chest Challenge, and I asked select male bloggers to try to raise $50 each. Anyone who did pledged to post a waist-to-neck nude picture of himself with the understanding that the picture could then be taken down after a few days. Several reached the $50 mark and posted the obligatory picture. I did, too.

For the purpose of the present essay, I herewith offer that picture again, and I shall leave the link up for 24 hours. Click here to see if there is any female equivalent of "bikini brain."

Perhaps I am wrong.


The Dark Wraith has been wrong before when it comes to knowing what works and what doesn't.


Technorati & Delicious tags · · · Delicious & Technorati tags

8 comments:

Nope. redface No bikini brain, here. wink I am not thinking of bikinis, at all.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 22 Feb '09 - 00:13
rthy
by: Debra (contact) - 22 Feb '09 - 01:32
DW This is sooo not the post I expected from you this morning. However, I did find it interesting and provocative. If what you say is true then I am greatly relieved. I like to see people who look healthy. Living in a resort area I, too, see all kinds of people in various stages of undress. We are exactly the reason most establishments have the "no shoes, no shirts, no service" signs. I was in a little cafe a month ago when the owner asked 2 young women to leave. Maybe it's just me but I just don't like the propect of my body parts or someone else's ending up in someone's food. Well, not in an eating establishment anyway. One of my eccentric neighbors is a nudist. He is a recluse and on the rare occasions he is in public he wears a sarong or a pair of shorts. He fell recently and had to be taken to the hospital. He is becoming frail as he nears 80. He had to come back home after that brief stay although he should not live alone. Apparently it is difficult to find an AL facility that will accept a cigar-smoking nudist! BTW you look fine!
by: Tenngran (contact) - 22 Feb '09 - 12:17
I'm shocked, shocked, you Wraithy one, you. If the good lord had wanted us to run around naked, we would have been born that way.

In my experience, being naked in a group helps break down barriers. People connect faster. Can't be bad. In fact, think what a great world it would be if we all went around so freely. Cheney would never for a moment lord it over anyone. Little weasels like Bush would be laughed out of office. Obama would still win. Handily.

But sadly, fun as they are, these mri studies may be flawed. New Scientist:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126914.700-doubts-raised-over-brain-scan-findings.html
by: astraea (contact) - 22 Feb '09 - 13:26
If god hadn't wanted us to be naked, he wouldn't have invented clothes.

"Indeed, I was the member-at-large."
And you criticize others for grandiosity?
by: Peter of Lone Tree (contact) - 22 Feb '09 - 16:35
The position was bestowed upon me, for God's sake, Peter.

The Dark Wraith does not campaign for high office.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 22 Feb '09 - 17:50
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 24 Feb '09 - 00:09
Beauty and the brain, women use more than men

Beauty is in the brain of the beholder. Go to any museum and there will be men and women admiring paintings and sculpture. But it turns out they are thinking about the sight differently. Men process beauty on the right side of their brains, while women use their whole brain to do the job, researchers report in Tuesday's electronic edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

They even explain it differently.

Novelist Margaret Wolfe Hungerford: "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

Essayist David Hume: "Beauty in things exists merely in the mind which contemplates them."

Researchers were surprised by the finding.

"It is well known that there are differences between brain activity in women and men in cognitive tasks," said researcher Camilo J. Cela-Conde of the University of Baleares in Palma de Mallorca, Spain. "However, why should this kind of difference appear in the case of appreciation of beauty?"

The answer seems to be that when women consider a visual object they link it to language while men concentrate on the spatial aspects of the object, Cela-Conde said in an interview by e-mail.

He noted, however, that this doesn't explain why — and how — the human capacity to appreciate beauty evolved.

"The differences that we have found might relate to the different social roles that, hypothetically, men and women had during human evolution." he said. [...]

For both sexes the most active region was the parietal lobe that deals with visual perception, spatial orientation and information processing, but it was focused on the right side of the brain in men while both sides participated in women.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 24 Feb '09 - 10:45



This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it
«Return to the Main Page of Big Brass Blog

Meta Information:

Title: Put Your Clothes On
Date posted: 21 Feb '09 - 23:19
No Trackbacks
Filed under: Sex
Good Karma: 3 (vote)
Bad Karma: 1 (vote)
Next entry: » Saturday Morning Musings
Previous entry: « Cowards and Thugs

Frontpage
:
:

Navigation

  Today
  Archives
  Contact

Calendar

Search


Blog Headlines

Advertisements

Dark Wraith's Bookstore

♦           ♦           ♦
Free Sound Effects
Download Free Sound Effects from AudioMicro.
♦           ♦           ♦

News

Diversions

In the News

Quote of the Day