Individual Entry

Brass Knuckle Blogs



Useful Links









Add to Technorati Favorites

[Valid RSS]

NucleusCMS
Nucleus CMS v3.24



template by i-marco's choice

Dynamic Drive

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS


Time to Go Pro

by: Chet Scoville

Jeffrey Feldman makes an excellent point about the connection between right-wing rhetoric and right-wing violence, and makes the following proposal:
In the heat of last week's Republican attack on John Edwards, Frameshop proposed the establishment of a new DNC task force to be charged specifically with protecting Democratic candidates--and by extension the U.S. electoral system--from the cancer of organized Republican smear.

On the heels of that prescription, the Republican smear of Edwards metastasized in two directions: a Christian nationalist group (Fidelis) that had long been in political remission, suddenly sprang back to life and sent blackmail letters to the campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and---most alarmingly--the threat of home-grown authoritarian violence against American citizens that had been at bay since the abortion clinic murders of the 1990s, suddenly re-emerged in the form of hate mail calling for the sodomy, rape and murder of two young women formerly employed by the John Edwards' campaign.
The idea of the task force is an excellent one; he sets out the following jobs for it:
The most important job of the task force will be to serve as the eyes and ears of current Democratic candidates. This will take the form initially of daily reports on the Republican smear campaign delivered in a manner that is immediately usable for the campaigns. These reports should include, but not be limited to:
  1. Republican smear campaign forecasts
  2. Status of ongoing campaigns
  3. Framing and Keyword analysis
  4. Background research
  5. Strategy and tactic suggestions
  6. Internet activist reports
All very good indeed; but I'd add only one detail: every Democratic campaign needs to have a complete dossier, pre-prepared, on every major hostile group, spokesperson, and talking head, with a fast set of instant media responses prepared to go at a moment's notice. I'm thinking about this sort of thing, but more detailed. The slowness of the Edwards campaign's response was just awful. It's not as if the attackers were unknown quantities or anything; there's no reason not to have instant rebuttals to them.

Let's get professional about this, okay?

Cross-posted at The Vanity Press.

4 comments:

Absolutely, positively, and about damned time!
by: Alex (contact) - 15 Feb '07 - 14:52
when the going gets wierd, the wierd turn pro.

hunter s. thompson
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 15 Feb '07 - 15:03
I agree, the dems cannot hesitate to strike back or ignore any of these attacks - that was what appalled me during the last campaign, the scrambling to deny or "correct" or apologize after an attack instead of meeting it head on and firing with everything they had. I hope they have learned that lesson. I was shocked by the blogger/Edwards mess and really sad when the ladies resigned but I completely understand it too - who wants to live with death threats? It's all so out of control.
by: Dogmom (contact) - 15 Feb '07 - 15:15
Good evening, Chet.

The Southern Poverty Law Center offers the model for cataloguing, monitoring, and tracking hate groups. What is being proposed in your article seems at first blush far more ambitious, if only because the source of these hate attacks appears more ubiquitous. Actually, it is not: the so-called "Right-Wing Authoritarian Followers" comprise maybe about a quarter of the population of this country, but the overwhelming majority of them are dormant unless harangued into action.

We have seen this before: huge numbers of RWA-F lie dormant until a Social Dominance-Oriented/Right-Wing Authoritarian (SDO/RWA) "double high" (as such a person is called in the literature) draws them to action. In historical terms, we saw this with a certain group of evangelicals who were brought to bear by Jerry Falwell; we saw it with Phyllis Schlafly of the Eagle Forum (with the Equal Rights Amendment); and we saw it again several times in the '90s, and one last time quite starkly with the thugs who laid seige to the facilities where Florida election officials were trying to commence a recount of the 2000 Presidential Election votes.

The RWA Followers are not dangerous unless and until they are bid to action by a small core of leader types, generally either financially well-off, themselves (as with Melton Scaif), or capable of generating large amounts of money (as with Pat Robertson, Sun Myung Moon, and Paul Weyrich).

As far as mitigating their influence is concerned, to some extent, it is a matter of open exposure. The RWA Followers are actually rather immune to public humiliation, but some (not all, but some) of the SDOs that set them in motion are fairly sensitive to the limelight, especially when it turns against them and they cannot cloister themselves against awareness of it.

To the extent that wide-ranging exposure of their action is not enough to slow them down, though, the next step is to move against them in the courts. This includes suits alleging torts, particularly torts of interference with business relationships. It also include suits alleging defamation. Finally, it also include an all-out effort to bring civil RICO charges to bear on them and their lieutenants.

To this last point, there will come a time when we must clarify in our own minds that this isn't "just politics"; this is, instead, an organized criminal enterprise that has spanned well more than a decade and used hundreds of millions of dollars to the purpose not of benefiting the democratic experience of these United States, but instead of interfering with and degrading it.

The Dark Wraith has spoken.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 15 Feb '07 - 16:14



This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it
«Return to the Main Page of Big Brass Blog

Meta Information:

Title: Time to Go Pro
Date posted: 15 Feb '07 - 14:19
No Trackbacks
Filed under: General
Good Karma: 3 (vote)
Bad Karma: 1 (vote)
Next entry: » Principles of Economics: Origins of the Discipline, Video Edition
Previous entry: « Duh, Funny

Frontpage
:
:

Navigation

  Today
  Archives
  Contact

Calendar

Search


Blog Headlines

Advertisements

Dark Wraith's Bookstore

♦           ♦           ♦
Free Sound Effects
Download Free Sound Effects from AudioMicro.
♦           ♦           ♦

News

Diversions

In the News

Quote of the Day