Individual Entry

Brass Knuckle Blogs



Useful Links









Add to Technorati Favorites

[Valid RSS]

NucleusCMS
Nucleus CMS v3.24



template by i-marco's choice

Dynamic Drive

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS


Lay Off It, Mr. Rangel

by: Dark Wraith

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) went on "Face the Nation" today and called for reinstating the draft, claiming he would introduce legislation to the effect in the next session of Congress. He claimed a draft would keep the country from going to war.

According to CNN.com, the Selective Service now has approximately 16 million individuals who have registered, as is now required by law.

Preventing wars is a noble goal, provided we are preventing thoroughly ill-planned, useless wars of opportunity based upon lies, the kind of military adventures the neo-conservatives favor. Preventing wars by pursuing honest, concerted, no-holds-barred diplomatic, economic, and political channels is statecraft in its most sublime form, and it is unfortunate that the American people have not been treated to examples of this since the Clinton Administration, even though many of those same Americans seem thoroughly unconscious of the scope of peace and brevity of military conflicts the United States had during that better era.

All of that aside, to Rep. Rangel I offer this advice:

While I respect your uncautioned and extensive criticism of this vile Administration, please use gamesmanship on something other than young lives, Mr. Rangel. You know exactly what you're doing: you're trying to hang 16 million human lives in front of a blood-thirsty band of hooligans, thinking they wouldn't dare pick a fight if a few of those millions were their children.

It's bad enough that we have the Bush Administration and its lackeys—both Republican and Democrat, I might point out—who drag us into bad wars, but your plan is going to provide them with all the flesh and blood they need to round out a war machine they're finally figuring out just doesn't work on the small-Army/big-technology paradigm of the Donald Rumsfeld era.

You seem to think it would be a good thing if, say, Jenna Bush were to have to serve in combat. Maybe that would disabuse her father of his fantasy world where wars are for the dumb, the brown, the poor, the outcasts, and the crazies to fight and die in. Maybe it would. Then again, maybe it wouldn't.

First, the rich will always find a way around the conscription of their kids if they really want to. That's just the way it is and always has been, and you cannot construct a draft that would not be made an instrument of the age-old sorting of the wretched, who will go to the trenches, from their betters, who will not.

But let's say, in a brief suspension of reality, that we really could send Jenna Bush into combat, and her father could not keep it from happening. Let's get down and dirty, shall we?

Do you know how an improvised explosive device does its savagery? You're driving along, and all of a sudden, the entire planet changes: your whole brain is full of roaring sound, and you're going up in their air: sky and ground flash alternately in front of you.

A bizarre cold is all over your back, your ass, and your legs: that's your skin melting into the seat.

When you hit the ground maybe 50 feet from where you started this split-second eternity, you're dead. Your optic screen is closing down from the periphery to the center: that's the "white light" people describe as some near-death experience, except that you're going to get to die all the way.

You can still hear for a few minutes; auditory perception will be the last thing to vanish into the black well. Even if you're screaming, you really don't know about it so much. You might stay around long enough to hear people: boots running and getting louder; someone yelling, "Aw, fuck, man... Oh-god-oh-god-oh-god... SHIT!"

You might hear the second one go off. That would be the one for some guys from the truck behind you: they were too shocked to think about a sucker bomb.

You get to close down, even though what's left of your body is jerking violently even after you're hopelessly dead.

You go away forever. The black well has finished swallowing you whole.

That's good because that means you don't have to hear the people who grieve for you when that guy plays the Taps on that forlorn bugle and those other soldiers do that painfully slow, methodical folding of the flag so they can hand it to someone who loved you.

You've gone away forever. That's if you're some crazy kid who signed up because he needed some way to prove he was a man, or if you're some rich kid who got sucked up in a draft whipped together by a Congressman who wanted to make a point.


Mr. Rangel, making war unpalatable to the war-mongers is no substitute for making peace attainable by the peacemakers.

Lay off this crusade of yours, sir. For the sake of 16 million people now, and countless millions who will come of draft age in the years ahead, let it go.



The Dark Wraith has spoken.

11 comments:

Was Bush bullshitin'. What? The axis of evil--along with no gay marriage--was just pandering for votes? We want our volunteer personnel rotating to Iraq a dozen times while we deal with the FACT that N. Korea is now a nuclear power, and that Iran soon will be?

Right before the elections, Fox and Friends said N. Korea was Bill Clinton's fault. Who the fuck was in power in the House, Senate and White House during the last 6 years? Oh yeah, the draft dodgers who never studied history, and who ignored the studies that showed that even with 400,000 troops in Iraq, failure was a strong possibility.

I served. You who were too dumb to follow the issues beyond Bush's no gay marriage and 9/11 propaganda, it's time to serve before one of our cities goes up in a mushroom cloud. Go fight them over there so you don't have to fight them over here. Or maybe, just maybe, use your brains next time.

Alex Alaniz, Ph.D., 1Lt (Sep.)
by: Alex Alaniz (contact) - 19 Nov '06 - 22:11
WTF??? I never would have pegged Rangel for an idea that dumb.
by: Chet Scoville (contact) - 19 Nov '06 - 22:59
Good evening, Chet.

Rep. Rangel has been pushing this legislative plan for several years, now. In fact, in its current incarnation, it's even more draconian than his previous proposals: now, he wants the draft age all the way up to 42 years.

The Dark Wraith thinks Rangel's new-found power as head of the House Ways and Means Committee has already gone to his head (and come out the other end).
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 19 Nov '06 - 23:05
This is Rangel's second shot at bring up his draft issue? And (from what I understood at the last go 'round) women would also be eligible for being drafted into the service?

If ol' Charley is doing this to further rile and make it even more unpalatable to the American people (especially now that so many more are against W's illegal Iraq-Nam), then good. Maybe enraged screaming masses of extremely PO-ed people will finally get someone's attention.

If not, draft all the neo-connies first.

I support the troops - but I damn the "C-i-C" and his PNAC posse who lied and sent them to war.

(But I do wish Rangel would STFU.)
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 19 Nov '06 - 23:28
DW - I come to you today to ask your help. I am overwhelmed with life. BUT -- I love life, so i'l STFU for the moment.
I just need a place for a few kids to come and blog later today. I can think of no better place and no better teacher in the world than you. I was hoping to do a weekly continuation of Veteran's Day.

PAM -- are the Veteran's Day sales over yet??

Let's have a' Veteran's Day -- RE-Loaded' forum every monday (t0day being week 1 to discuss what we are going to do about helping the thousands of vets ALREADY dealing with the horrors of war, the vets currently caught up in this mess, and what we need to do to prepare for their return, I AM IN NO CONDITION TO GO DOWN THIS ROAD WITH MR. RANGEL at the moment. Although his announcement was very timely for my middle one ......
My daughter had to write a persuasive speech to be given today in class. She is 16. My son is 17. She wrote about the possibility of the draft coming back because that's all she hears hubby and I discussing. She found a little info and wrote what she could.

I wrote a post on it this morning over a blondesense. I just sent her off to school with copies of the Reuters story and a few other pieces of info on
http://www.sss.gov/
http://www.army.com/enlist/sss.html

http://uspolitics.about.com/od/electionissues/a/draft.htm

etc,.......
I told her that if anyone was interested in finding out more, that hopefully she would have a blog address to give them tomorrow so they can come and learn a few things.
What do you think?
by: Jersey Cynic (contact) - 20 Nov '06 - 04:24
Good morning, Jersey Cynic.

I should caution you that, although kids of reasonable age are welcome with great delightful by me here, this particular post is not quite in character for me, given that I took license to use language stronger than in my more typical posts, as I did in another post about military life and combat, "I Am Become Battle, How White Be My Tears."

The point, of course, is to convey the horror and to try to convince those unfamiliar with it that, unlike in the movies, it is real, and it is the direct and abiding consequence of deliberate decisions. Should Mr. Rangel get his wish about the reinstatement of the draft, he too will be a cause in the effect of that horror.

Do send the kids over.

Tell them to bring snacks for everyone here.

The Dark Wraith will comb his beard to look presentable.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 20 Nov '06 - 05:10
I am hoping this move by Rangel is simply a wake-up call, a scare tactic to the huge numbers of Americans who feel, for whatever reason, immune to the war -- probably because it's "over there" and we're "over here" and there's no connection other than lost lives of soldiers the vast majority of us will never know personally.

One of my friends, who has a son about to turn 18, commented on my blog that if the draft is reinstated, she will move to Canada. I am hoping that many millions of Americans who have either blindly supported the war or simply been too disengaged from world affairs to give a shit (i.e. perhaps the people who are too consumed with getting their hands on the new PlayStation), will have a sudden awakening now.
by: Konagod (contact) - 20 Nov '06 - 06:04
When Charlie brought it up a few years ago, he needed to STFU and even more so now. All this will do is give them more bodies to dispose of, they won't make decisions in the troops best interests, they never do. Nobody should be made to participate in a war that they personally didn't start.

Why is it that old men feel the need to prove their manhood by killing off the youth of their country? This is a really bad idea, one of many I have heard for the last six years and like the others it won't end well.

All the time and money wasted on war making materials that can't be used, our guys are back to fighting like it was the Revolutionary days, but this time we are the Hessians. Give me back my country before there is no country worth coming back to. sad
by: Debra (contact) - 20 Nov '06 - 06:33
Mr. Rangel is quite clear when he speaks that he knows this has no chance of passing. He is using it as a tool to point out the hypocrisy of the elites who have been so cavelier with the lives of our children. I agree totatlly with the Dark Wraith. Normally, I enjoy hearing from Mr. Rangel, he is a gadfly of great skill. This time, no. I cannot endorse a protestation of our children's lives being toyed with and pushed around like a chess piece to point out that our children's lives are being toyed with and pushed around like chess pieces. The administration might not get the joke. They have their heir apparent McCain calling for more troops and they have their top general Abizaid telling Congress that there aren't any more troops. Considering all the other things Bush has tried and measures he has taken to avoid admitting that he was wrong wrong wrong wrong on this one, he might just be desperate enough now to be willing to face the storms of protest that would blow through the college campuses should a draft be reconstituted. Were that to happen we would need to take steps to protect our daughters as well as our sons. Quite frankly, I already have. It pained my veteran's soul to do so, but I saw no other path which made sense to me. I wouldn't wish anyone else's children to be dragooned into the service of this failed adventure either. If they seriously want to explore a draft or national service period they should do it when those who have already served long and hard are home safely. Home safely and properly cared for. This is far too serious an issue for political gamesmenship. I expected better from Mr. Rangel (who saw combat service in Korea).
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 20 Nov '06 - 06:48
We already have a draft. It is called the "economic draft"
by: doug (contact) - 20 Nov '06 - 10:14
<i>Mr. Rangel is quite clear when he speaks that he knows this has no chance of passing</i>

Yeah, but what if it did? You always, you know, run that risk when you introduce a bill. And frankly, it's an abuse of the legislative process to introduce a bill just to make a "point." It was wrong when the Republicans introduced their going-nowhere culture-war bills, and it's wrong now.
by: Chet Scoville (contact) - 21 Nov '06 - 08:18



This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it
«Return to the Main Page of Big Brass Blog

Meta Information:

Title: Lay Off It, Mr. Rangel
Date posted: 19 Nov '06 - 21:41
No Trackbacks
Filed under: Editorial
Good Karma: 6 (vote)
Bad Karma: 3 (vote)
Next entry: » Dec. 22 is marked on my calendar
Previous entry: « Tea Party

Frontpage
:
:

Navigation

  Today
  Archives
  Contact

Calendar

Search


Blog Headlines

Advertisements

Dark Wraith's Bookstore

♦           ♦           ♦
Free Sound Effects
Download Free Sound Effects from AudioMicro.
♦           ♦           ♦

News

Diversions

In the News

Quote of the Day