Individual Entry

Brass Knuckle Blogs



Useful Links









Add to Technorati Favorites

[Valid RSS]

NucleusCMS
Nucleus CMS v3.24



template by i-marco's choice

Dynamic Drive

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS


Observations From The Poor Side Of Town

by: Debra

I really am tired of hearing people say that they can stimulate the economy and improve people's standard of living by cutting taxes.  They tend to forget one ittybitty little point.  One has to have a job in order to pay taxes.   Not only do you have to have a job, you have to have a job that pays over $10,000 a year before you start paying taxes and then you won't qualify to have your taxes cut because you don't make enough money.   As if an extra ten dollars on your refund would make that much of a difference in your life.

Looking at things from the poor side of town and almost making do with what we have,  it's hard to believe that people who make over $250,000 a year can't make ends meet and deserve a tax cut. They could always cut back on the caviar and champagne and replace it with beans and beer like the rest of us.

Two separate Americas?  You betcha!

Does Europe have homeless people living on the street? Just wondering.

Debsweb

9 comments:

it's hard to believe that people who make over $250,000 a year can't make ends meet and deserve a tax cut.

Of course they don't deserve a tax cut just as any other citizen might. They have more money than you are comfortable with them having, so they deserve to be punished for that. [/sarcasm]
by: Newbie (contact) - 16 Oct '08 - 15:17
Your sarcasm is lost on me.
by: blackdog (contact) - 16 Oct '08 - 19:53
It is sarcastic to say that one person should be punished just because someone else thinks that that person has too much money. It's contrary to normal reason. I think that the sarcasm was lost because many people around here agree that people should be punished for having too much money.
by: Newbie (contact) - 16 Oct '08 - 21:34
Persons with annual earnings/income of $250 K and north have typically crossed the line into the portfolio class, however small or large their investments. They can afford to absorb the tax cuts Obama proposes to be thrown their way.

For the non-investment class, or wage slaves, who face rising healthcare, food, and housing costs with dwindling earnings and job prospects, Obama's tax plan is far superior and McCain's plan only benefits the rich.
by: 2Truthy (contact) - 16 Oct '08 - 22:32
They can afford to absorb the tax cuts Obama proposes to be thrown their way.

i.e. They it is your opinion that they have too much money compared to the average person, therefore they have to pay for others' tax cuts.

For the non-investment class, or wage slaves, who face rising healthcare, food, and housing costs with dwindling earnings and job prospects, Obama's tax plan is far superior and McCain's plan only benefits the rich.

i.e. help one group of people by hurting another
by: Newbie (contact) - 17 Oct '08 - 12:33
Oh, I get it. Only the little people should suffer and the rich go on partying while America falls into a depression. Back when income tax first started, it was considered a privilege to pay taxes because only the rich could afford them. The ability to pay taxes was a status symbol and people were proud to pay them as it showed that they had more money than other people in the community. Now the rich don't want to pay taxes and expect the little guy to pick up the slack while the have mores eat caviar and drink champagne.

Meanwhile our bridges are falling down, roads are in their worst state since before Eisenhower built the interstates, health care has become a joke and poverty is increasing at a phenomenal rate because the rich enjoy stock dividends while Joe Six-Pack looks for a job in the country of his birth.
by: Debra (contact) - 17 Oct '08 - 13:21
No, all Americans should share our nations burdens. All Americans should see the same treatment.

Back when income tax first started, it was considered a privilege...

Interesting. Do you have any links or references that say this?

Now the rich don't want to pay taxes and expect the little guy to pick up the slack...

How about everyone carry the burden. We are all in this together.

the have mores eat caviar and drink champagne.

I have read that quote several times on Left blogs about people who earn more than $250,000 annually. I personally know many people at that income level and I know of none that eat caviar and drink champagne. $1million maybe, $10million more likely, $250,000 not so much.
by: Newbie (contact) - 17 Oct '08 - 15:51
sup Exactly, Deb. The point is just so obvious.

Back in the summer of '07, even Warren Buffett said that there was a huge disparity between his paying a tax rate of 17.7 percent on the $46 million he made, and his secretary having to pay 30 percent on the $60,000 she earned. I don't understand why anyone can't see that as a valid concern for the everyday working class folks who are the ones being punished by having a larger tax burden than the (tax-welfare) rich do.

McSame wants to keep allowing the rich to benefit, to the detriment of the not-so-rich.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 17 Oct '08 - 15:52
FG, are you saying that $250,000 is the same as $46 million? As one of the "everyday working class folks" I would like to know?
by: Newbie (contact) - 17 Oct '08 - 16:14



This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it
«Return to the Main Page of Big Brass Blog

Meta Information:

Title: Observations From The Poor Side Of Town
Date posted: 16 Oct '08 - 14:19
No Trackbacks
Filed under: United States
Good Karma: 2 (vote)
Bad Karma: 2 (vote)
Next entry: » HALP, PLZ
Previous entry: « Obama Gets It and Gets It Right (on Free Trade, Anyway)

Frontpage
:
:

Navigation

  Today
  Archives
  Contact

Calendar

Search


Blog Headlines

Advertisements

Dark Wraith's Bookstore

♦           ♦           ♦
Free Sound Effects
Download Free Sound Effects from AudioMicro.
♦           ♦           ♦

News

Diversions

In the News

Quote of the Day