Individual Entry

Brass Knuckle Blogs



Useful Links









Add to Technorati Favorites

[Valid RSS]

NucleusCMS
Nucleus CMS v3.24



template by i-marco's choice

Dynamic Drive

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS


The Rumor about Sarah

by: Dark Wraith

UPDATE — September 1, 2008, 2:20 p.m. EDT: In what might be characterized as a remarkable coincidence, Sarah Palin, GOP nominee John McCain's running mate, has announced that her 17-year-old daughter Bristol is five months pregnant. Rumors had been swirling in the Blogosphere that Gov. Palin had faked her last pregnancy to cover for her daughter, who was absent from school for almost five months with what the family claimed was a case of mononucleosis (see the main story below for details). Now, however, with the announcement that the unmarried Bristol was pregnant in April of this year, it would be impossible for Palin's latest child, Trig, who was born April 18, 2008, to have been Bristol's.

The Palin family is not releasing information about the individual who impregnated Bristol, other than that his first name is "Levi," and that he is going to marry Bristol. While the family's discretion in protecting the young man is admirable given that Gov. Palin is now making her daughter a public figure to kill a rumor, the question of his age is a matter of concern, given that Bristol might have been 16 years old at the time he impregnated her.

Nevertheless, the announcement of Bristol's pregnancy, as stunningly convenient as the situation is, should pretty much end any questions about who the mother of Trig really is.

At least for the time being.


*                *                *


The story is now making the rounds fast about John McCain's running mate, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. The gist of the gossip is that her last child is not hers, but is, instead, her daughter's. The basis of the rumor is that pictures of the Governor when she was supposed to be pregnant show a woman who has no visible evidence of abdominal enlargement, but in the same time frame, her 16-year-old daughter was absent for four months from school with a case of mononucleosis, a condition that, for most teenagers, indicates bed rest for a far shorter period of time.

The case gets more interesting. She was in Texas when she claimed her water broke. Instead of heading straight to a hospital to give birth, she got on a plane back to Alaska; and, once there, instead of going to a hospital in Anchorage, she went to a clinic in her home town. All of this after her water broke. (As commenter Labrys pointed out to me from her personal experience, many women giving birth to a fifth child would not have the luxury of deciding when and where to deliver after the water had broken.)

The rumors about Gov. Palin's pregnancy actually being her daughter’s were swirling before John McCain even heard of her, and no professional vetting group for a national politician would have wanted their man to be within light-years of a person with a rumor like that hanging over her head. This seems to confirm speculation, contrary to the more official story, that Palin was, indeed, a last-minute choice for McCain, a choice made without thorough prior investigation of the potential running mate's background. Regardless of whether or not the rumor about Palin's child had any truth to it, that rumor had legs. In Palin's role as governor, it was more or less a "gentlemen's understanding" that the suspect nature of her story about the child's parenthood would not be used against her except by malcontents, in somewhat the same way the rumors about John Edwards' affair were well known, but better journalists and politicians did not talk about the matter.

That standard has been around for generations among journalists and politicians alike, and it has often served better ends, although in some cases the widely known secrets have allowed venal people to keep doing venal things, as was the case with J. Edgar Hoover and others whose personal lives were at radical odds with their public positions and actions. Palin is, however, no J. Edgar Hoover, nor is she a John Edwards: her secret, if the rumor proves to be true, was arguably to the purpose of "protecting" her daughter, even though a cynic might point out that she was really trying to protect her own credentials among her conservative Republican supporters. Palin would not be the first parent who went to extraordinary lengths to hide a daughter's pregnancy, not for the benefit of the daughter, but instead for the protection of the family name and its reputation in the community.

The rumor about Palin has not, however, been proven beyond reasonable doubt, and it is only right to make that point very clear. First, she has been thrown into a national meat grinder, and a magnifying glass is being turned on her in the worst way possible. She is vulnerable precisely because she is brand new to national politics. That John McCain's team did not fully and properly vet her is an indictment of those so-called professionals, not of her.

Second, concerning that pregnancy, the claims that she did not "look" pregnant at the seventh month are not proof of anything: to describe Sarah Palin (and her husband, for that matter) as athletic is an understatement. Descriptions of her personal lifestyle point to someone with muscles that most flabby Americans would only dream of having, and that kind of body will carry a pregnancy far more tightly for far longer than most. For the typical, less-than-muscular American to use personal experience in assessing what a woman with muscular abs would look like pregnant is like the typical American male, who looks like an idiot sweating and gasping as he jogs the neighborhood, describing the runner's high in a 30-mile mountain marathon.

Finally, yes, teenagers can be down for months with mono. According to the Mayo Clinic, "Most signs and symptoms of mononucleosis ease within a few weeks, but it may be two to three months before you feel completely normal." Four months out of school, as was the case with Palin's daughter, is outside this indication, but the claim that kids get better in a few weeks is far too simplistic.

Unfortunately, the rumor mill is kicking into high gear, and already there are indications that the story of Gov. Palin's child is getting perilously close to the mainstream media, which might end up eating her alive if a few ambitious TV or big newspaper journalists have nothing better to do than grab this story and run with it.

I had no intention whatsoever of writing about this rumor here at Big Brass Blog because it had the taste of nothing other than sleazy prying into personal, family issues; but then something occurred to me that changed my mind, and I need to point this out: if Palin did, indeed, represent her 16-year-old daughter's pregnancy as her own, that's a personal if more than slightly questionable choice; if, however, the baby were represented in public filings (specifically, the application for a birth certificate) as hers when it was actually her daughter's, we are talking about a criminal act.

If that birth certificate was the evidence for acquiring a Social Security Number for the child, then a federal crime may have been committed, as well.

If the child is not Gov. Palin's, but she represented it as hers in seeking coverage under her health insurance plan, then she has committed insurance fraud, too.

In summary, once a lie like that starts, it becomes a cascade of lies that transforms almost seamlessly into a pattern of wrongdoing. Once the line between prevarication and criminal activity has been crossed, what was, upon casual consideration, a personal matter becomes something entirely different.

I am not sure this matter is going to get the vultures in the mainstream media interested right away, but it has explosive potential, and it could force McCain to change his mind and get her off the ticket. It could get ugly: circling media hounds; initial denials; then the tearful confession. In the aftermath, McCain—a man whose violent temper is legendary—will have the Tantrum to End All Tantrums in private meetings with his inner circle of advisers, and a wholesale shake-up of his inner cirlce will ensue, sort of like the centrifugal force experienced by the swirling material in a flushing toilet.

At the same time, the hapless public will be inundated with clueless media "consultants" talking about the "underlying issues" of teen pregnancy and parental support while assiduously avoiding the whole issue of a woman's right to choose. In the end, not one mainstream media personality will dare to mention the obvious: for Palin, an anti-abortion stalwart, "pro-life" meant "pro-lie."

No, John McCain's people certainly did not investigate Gov. Sarah Palin the way they should have. If they had, they would have been visited by an unmistakably clear vision of McCain's Straight Talk Express going straight over a cliff. Now, McCain and his team could very well experience that exciting ride in real time.


The Dark Wraith encourages everyone to step aside as the McCain Express flies by on its way to paydirt.

Cross-posted from The Dark Wraith Forums


Technorati & Delicious tags · · · · · Delicious & Technorati tags

37 comments:

...before John McCain even heard of her...

Interesting. On what date did John McCain hear of her?
by: Newbie (contact) - 31 Aug '08 - 21:24
Let the National Enquirer sort it out?

I do admit to having my own issues with her getting on the campaign trail with having a four month old that needs tending to and bonding with. Not very motherly, IMHO.

...Oops, forgot that with those pro-lifers (who support capital punishment and war) only value life between conception and birth.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 31 Aug '08 - 21:24
Go use a search engine and answer your own question, if that's so important to you. Most of the country hasn't heard of her, either. Search that, too.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 31 Aug '08 - 21:27
Newbie!

You're back!

Taking trivial exception to my hard-hitting journalism, of course; but that means it's really you!

The Dark Wraith missed getting his heels nipped.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 31 Aug '08 - 21:46
Turnabout is fair play, where is Obama's birth certificate? For that matter, how about a lot of historical archives on Obama that are being held up either by the Chicago Machine or the Ivy League? This is a BAD path for the Dems.
by: M. Zelenz (contact) - 31 Aug '08 - 21:50
M. Zelenz:

Geez, are all you trolls computer and search function impaired?

Try going here,

and here.

Sheesh. It was only the first site that came up in a search.

This is a BAD path for the Repubs.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 31 Aug '08 - 22:10
Relax, M. Zelenz.

If Barry Soetoro's birth and citizenship issues rise to a sufficient level of suspicion in my judgment (and the key here is "in my judgment" since this online property belongs to me), I will go after Obama on the matter like a Washington politician going for an AIPAC donation check.

And if I do, I will suffer the harassment, intimidation, threats, and bullying of the Left just as much as I've taken the nonsense from the Right-wing Authoritarian Followers over the past years.

So far, I see only a minor issue with Obama and his citizenship, and the issue is largely a technical, legal matter exacerbated by standing State Department policy that is still subject to varying (and capricious, in some cases) enforcement. What it says about Obama's character is another matter, but I have plenty of more substantive issues on which to attack that sorry excuse for a presidential nominee. Trying to make hay with a birth certificate and name issue is, as far as I can tell right now, not nearly as productive as going after him (and John McCain) on the issues.

That might change, and it might change because I get more incriminating evidence, or it might change if the Leftists decide they want to keep spitting their venom at me every blessed time I dare to question that man who plays the messiah card.

I can play hard ball, too.

Including with you, M. Zelenz, if your choice is to wet yourself over a lost cause like Palin on my property.

The Dark Wraith is an equal opportunity bitch.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 31 Aug '08 - 22:21
Now, McCain and his team could very well experience that exciting ride in real time.


Couldn't happen to a better bunch of (semi) humans.
by: Phydeaux Speaks (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 10:04
Dark Wriath, me thinks that John McCain's condescending and sexist VP pick of pro-life, pro-drilling Alaska governor Sarah Palin is proof positive and just one of the primary reasons that Republicans do better than Democrats in the campaigning process. Democratic campaigns make the mistake of thinking that Americans, on the whole, are swayed by logic. Republicans think of voters as stupid, and sadly, they are somewhat closer to the mark.

Obama selected an old crust guy with butt loads of Washington experience, McSame picks a youthful, inexperienced outsider who packs a pistol------what a huge relief this must be to the hard-line Republicans who were dreading a pick who was as weak a conservative as McCain, but is being cast by most in the political blowhard class as an extremely risky pick. In part because nobody knows who the hell she is!

Being a shirt-tail cuz of mine, Sarha has always reminded me a little of Frances McDormand in Fargo but, prettier.

What I find more interesting than who the baby's mama is is that the moose burger eating Senator from Alaska (Pat Buchanna mentioned this as a huge plus) is that Sarah is under investigation for possibly abusing her power by dismissing a state official who wouldn't fire a state trooper who was once married to her sister (Pain reportedly believed that the man was abusive).
by: Ms. Mule (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 11:20
Left wingers can not win fairly on the issues. They are the lowest form of life with no imagination. I only hope that they take responsibility if Obama the the "uh um..ah..um..umm ah candidate plunges the United States into complete and total chaos. It is the left wing nut jobs who never take responsibility for their votes. Remember the only thing that gives them ability to voice their opinion however ludicrous is the very individuals they so hate. If Obama does get elected his complete and total inexperience coupled with his god like arrogance may very well create the socialistic euphoria the left wing truly want. Careful what you wish for. Take responsibility for your vote and understand that when your wonderful euphoria leaves you wanting...you will once again turn to us to fix your mess.
by: cynergee (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 12:56
Don't airlines have some sort of restrictions about how far advanced a pregnancy can be?True, this is anecdotal, but I've been told about women who've had to have statements about expected delivery date and general health from their physician before being allowed to set foot on the plane during their eighth month.
A woman whose water has broken is probably past that deadline, ya think?

We have been told it was a 9-hour trip from Texas to Alaska, with a stopover to get to the clinic where delivery took place.
After four previous pregnancies, 'non-active' labor can go to 'active' between one contraction and the next, and all of a sudden IT'S SHOWTIME, FOLKS.

I'm just saying that what we've been told and the logistics don't add up. confused

I won't even go into how 'gentlemen's agreements' like this can become security risks at the higher levels of government...blackmail isn't always about money.
by: tali (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 13:30
Should this even be an issue? As this guy thinks:

http://crustylogic.blogspot.com/
by: Walk (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 13:39
Good afternoon, cynergee.

As I recall, Bill Clinton repaired the mess left by your hero duo, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

As I recall, Jimmy Carter repaired the mess left by your dynamic duo, Richard M. Nixon and Gerald R. Ford.

Gee. Who fixes whose problems?

History is not on your side; but that's okay: you still got another eight years of utter incompetence:

the U.S. mainland couldn't be defended from nineteen religious maniacs;

the U.S. is taking longer to pound a little sandlot country into the dirt than it took to utterly crush the combined forces of the Third Reich and the Japanese Imperial Army;

the U.S. is spiraling into bind-bending, year-over-year budget deficits that are literally wrecking credit markets here and abroad;

the Federal Reserve has propped up the fiscal incompetence of Republicans in the White House and Congress by printing excessive money for so long that we are now in a spiraling inflation;

the Russians and the Chinese are spinning us around like a top as they take control not just of resources, but also of trade and transport routes across Asia, Eastern Europe, and Mesopotamia;

our own federal and local police forces have transformed our nation into a spy-cam free-for-all for every incompetent law enforcement agency that thinks technology and intimidation are wonderful substitutes for freedom and privacy;

federal law enforcement and prosecution machinery was taken over by sick Dominionists and their seditious view that the U.S. Constitution (a document, by the way, I once swore to defend, and I will) should be supplanted by their version of a holy book;

our armed forces are at the lowest level of readiness in modern history, and all we can do is pump more and more money into the pockets of military contractors while our inability to project theater-level force globally has become the clarion call for ambitious large and small countries around the world to run amok against our national interests...

Okay, I'm getting winded listing the ways your miserable hero Republicans have saved our country.

Enjoy the next four years. Whoever gets the job of being President is going to spend his time cleaning up the biggest mess this country has had since Herbert Hoover.

Who knows? If McCain is elected, maybe he'll put you in charge; then, when you fail miserably like every ideologically driven person does, he'll throw one of his legendary, screaming, chair-throwing fits at you.

[Side Memo to John McCain: Please do one of those hissy fits of yours to me someday. I mean really. Please. That way we can compare bad tempers. I'll bet you'll like mine, you cute old bitch.]

There's the ticket. The Republican model of leadership and followership: authoritarian bullies and their authoritarian sycophants.

Welcome to the Republican way of life.

The Dark Wraith just loves it when Republican followers beg for another whipping.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 13:46
Jeebus Wraith, but you have a talent for smoking trolls out from under their rocks.

Before I let the Woof out again I will study the situation closely. Looking under the bed is simply out of the question, as is walking backward in a dimly lit room.

And for Gawd's sake, don't open that closet door!
by: blackdog (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 14:58
Go use a search engine and answer your own question

LOL, DW claimed to know the answer. Maybe he does not.
by: Newbie (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 16:00
What in Heaven's name are you rambling about, Newbie?

For God's sake, leave me out of your vision quests, man; I have enough trouble getting paid for cameo appearances in ladies' fantasies.

The Dark Wraith might have to start charging union scale.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 16:12
I am not "rambling", DW. You seemed to claim to know that date that John McCain first heard of Sarah Palin.

"The rumors about Gov. Palin's pregnancy actually being her daughter’s were swirling before John McCain even heard of her..."

Perhaps you did not know when he first heard of her and were just trying to make some point by making up that claim?
Taking trivial exception to my hard-hitting journalism

DW, are you saying that the facts should not get in the way of "hard hitting journalism"? (Unless you do, indeed, know that dates in question.)

I am not telling you that McCain or Obama are good, bad or any other thing. I just like asked you about a reference to a rather obscure date that you claimed to have knowledge about. However, when pressed, you can not quote either the date or a source reference. Thank you.
by: Newbie (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 19:44
The date's available on the internets, Newbie. Look it up.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 20:10
Oh, Newbie, stop it. You're trying to split hares when Bugs Bunny is already dead.

That's right, Newbie: Elmer Fudd finally shot him. It happened when Elmer finally invited Sarah Palin—a big gun freak who likes to shoot wolves and moose—along on a hunting expedition.

Elmer Fudd also got killed, of course. That's because he invited Dick Cheney along, too.

Unfortunately, that means no objective witnesses are left to tell what happened when Dead-Eye Dick and Bang-Bang Sarah went head-to-head.

Rumor is, Dick cheated: he called in an air strike.

That's when Sarah said, "You can't do that; I'm pregnant!"

Cheney shot back, "Baloney! How come you don't look fat?"

Sarah answered, "Because I eat moose burgers. You're fat because you eat children."

Cheney order Hellfire missiles to rain down on Palin.

Fortunately, she got away.

John McCain was impressed when Cheney told him what happened, so John named her as his running mate after he met her on a stormy night in early July in a dark alley behind Al's Bar & Grill to confirm the story.

He said, "Helllloooo, Governor."

She slapped him silly.

They hit it off instantly.

The rest is history, Newbie.

The Dark Wraith really shouldn't have to educate you on this kind of stuff.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 20:54
ing6 "It's wabbit season."

"It's duck season."

"Wabbit season."

"Duck season."

"Wabbit."

"Duck."

"Duck? What du....?" POW!
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 21:09
Ok, Foiled Goil, I give up. I can not find the date that John McCain first heard of Sarah Palin by searching on the internet. Any tips.

DW,

Oh, Newbie, stop it. You're trying to split hares when Bugs Bunny is already dead.

Stop what. Catching you in a lie?, fabrication? what then? Do you know the date that John McCain first heard of Sarah Palin or don't you? LOL cool
by: Newbie (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 22:59
LOL, Newbie. If you can't find it, perhaps you're asking the wrong question. So, maybe you should just give up your dated game.

Yes, once again, you're stuck in your whiny little nit-picking schtick, overlooking all the other content in a post and focusing in on one minor thing, and trying to frame it as something important... as usual. Yawn.

Sorry, but I'm not going to meet your expectations and help you out.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 01 Sep '08 - 23:51
I think I speak for everybody here when I say, "We've missed you, Newbie."

Okay, I guess I'm not speaking for everybody.

The Dark Wraith shouldn't over-generalize his own sentimental heart.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 00:23
The Dark Wraith is snarkalicious.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 00:28
No, Foiled Goil. It would appear that I caught DW in a lie and he can not get out of it and he has his pets here to help attack anyone who can find his lies.

Sorry, but I'm not going to meet your expectations and help you out.

LOL, because you, too, do not know the date the John McCain first heard of Sarah Palin. Good try to twist and spin out of this one.

focusing in on one minor thing, and trying to frame it as something important...

No, FG. Wrong again. I focus on a lie. (Although, to many here, lies are minor points) I did not say anything about DW's main point about McCain or Palin being in error.
by: Newbie (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 07:03
You caught nothing, except some of McSame's dementia. That's what you get for still drinking the neo-con Kool-Aid.

And I DO know when, because I found it searching the intertubes. It's not my fault you can't find that. There are hundreds of links. I've got absolutely NO reason to help you. You continue to make up spin and twist baiting BS to accuse other people of lying. Nope; I'm not helping you out. I owe you nothing.

Third day of your whining nit-picking pettiness... same ol' same old. Nothing new there.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 07:47
Third day of spinning being unable to support the tiniest claim. All the more entertaining because it just makes it look like nobody here knows the answer. How about stopping the na na na and just prove me wrong by posting a link to or the actual date that John McCain first heard of Sarah Palin? What more motivation than to prove me wrong (unless you don't know the answer)?
by: Newbie (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 08:16
How about you take your nonsense and go jump off a bridge to nowhere?

How about stopping your wah wah wah bullshit?

I do know the answer. Too bad you can't find it. That's so typical of the incompetence of the party you side with.

You don't get your way with me. You don't intimidate me, or anyone else here. Let me repeat myself: I AM NOT GOING TO HELP YOU OUT.

Now, go pout some more.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 08:27
How about just proving me wrong that nobody here knows the date that John McCain heard of Sarah Palin? I love it. It would be Sooo easy to prove me wrong, but you just can't do it because you do not know the answer. ing6 What would make you more happy than just prove me wrong. Keep on spinning. sup

p.s. I admit that I can not find a link to this information. I find link after link regarding the date the the McCain Campaign began concidering her, but none quoting a date that he first "heard" of her. I presume that it would have been in the summer or fall of 2006 during her election or her canpaign.

The rumors about Gov. Palin's pregnancy actually being her daughter’s were swirling before John McCain even heard of her

Interesting that the baby was conceived in about August 2007 (based on the birth date less 9 months). How exactly in August 2007 "before" fall 2006? Spin out of that one. cool
by: Newbie (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 09:13
correction of typo:

How exactly is August 2007 "before" fall 2006? Spin out of that one.
by: Newbie (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 09:35
It's your presumptive theory, you explain it.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 20:53
LOL. That's the whole point, FG. It can't be explained, because DW posted a false assumption that you claim in fact, but can not prove. Spin as you will, you can not prove when John McCain first heard of Sarah Palin. ing6
by: Newbie (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 22:57
LOL No. That is not the point.

You are the one that is doing all the spinning and twisting, and calling people liars because you cannot find a link. And you think that if you keep pestering someone else to do that for you is going to work. It just isn't, so give it up.

The point is that neither the Dark Wraith nor I have to prove any thing to you. Give it up.

Another point is that you: presume that it would have been in the summer or fall of 2006 during her election or her canpaign.

Dark Wraith posted no false assumptions. You have.

So just stop with your badgering and baiting. Give it up.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 02 Sep '08 - 23:40
No, FG, here is my point.

Put up or shut up.

Prove me wrong, if you can. I say that John McCain did not document the first time that he ever heard of Sarah Palin. You get such pleasure from telling me that I am wrong. How about proving it for once.

Dark Wraith posted no false assumptions.

That is debatable, but no one who claims that is it correct will debate it. No one will post any support to prove DW's assumption was correct. It's very hard to prove a negative. How am I to prove to you that John McCain did not document the first time that he heard of Sarah Palin? I can't. But, it's pretty darn easy to prove that DW was correct if he would just post a link, a date, a reference, anything.

Take your best shot prove me wrong for once.
by: Newbie (contact) - 03 Sep '08 - 10:16
"Put up or shut up." being a figure of speech, not an order or request.
by: Newbie (contact) - 03 Sep '08 - 10:26
train2
by: Debra (contact) - 03 Sep '08 - 13:53
I've proven you wrong lots of times, Columbus.

Here's my point, Newbie: rdman

You don't have the authority to tell me what to do.

You are not the boss of me. My cat is.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 03 Sep '08 - 18:06



This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it
«Return to the Main Page of Big Brass Blog

Meta Information:

Title: The Rumor about Sarah
Date posted: 31 Aug '08 - 20:46
No Trackbacks
Filed under: Editorial
Good Karma: 4 (vote)
Bad Karma: 2 (vote)
Next entry: » Gustav Heading To Gulf Coast, NOLA
Previous entry: « Sunday Morning Musings

Frontpage
:
:

Navigation

  Today
  Archives
  Contact

Calendar

Search


Blog Headlines

Advertisements

Dark Wraith's Bookstore

♦           ♦           ♦
Free Sound Effects
Download Free Sound Effects from AudioMicro.
♦           ♦           ♦

News

Diversions

In the News

Quote of the Day