Individual Entry

Brass Knuckle Blogs



Useful Links









Add to Technorati Favorites

[Valid RSS]

NucleusCMS
Nucleus CMS v3.24



template by i-marco's choice

Dynamic Drive

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS


Key Democrats Knew, Did Not Object to U.S. Torture Policy

by: Dark Wraith

Updated Decemeber 10, 2007, at 4:00 p.m. EDT Here's the joke for the evening: What's the difference between a Republican and a Democrat? The Republican thinks you're too stupid to care; the Democrat thinks you're too stupid to know.

It turns out that Reps. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Jane Harman (D-CA), and Sens. Bob Graham (D-FL) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-WV), were all extensively, thoroughly, and fully briefed in 2002 by the CIA about its overseas torture programs. Moreover, not only did none of them raise any objections other than for a minor, mealy-mouthed whine from Harman, but apparently someone in the group wanted to know if the CIA could push any harder on the detainees.

Words cannot even begin to adequately describe these appalling conspirators masquerading as some kind of actual opposition to the outrageousness of the Bush Administration.

The Republicans were right: leading Democrats knew all along that the United States was violating federal law, flouting international treaties, and acting against civilized standards of conduct; and here those pandering, craven conspirators—yes, conspirators—are, now acting like somehow they're not every bit as culpable and, indeed, guilty.

Now, be sure to go out and vote for some more Democrats. Let's take this country back from the Republicans. Let's put it in the hands of people who can still make you believe their lies.

Whatever gets you through the night, people.


The Dark Wraith is delighted to have made it to a century that offers no illusion of daylight.

Update: Pelosi Statement on Washington Post Report on Congressional Briefing of Administration Interrogation Techniques

Washington, D.C. -- Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement on a report in today's Washington Post about a congressional briefing on Administration interrogation techniques:

"On one occasion, in the fall of 2002, I was briefed on interrogation techniques the Administration was considering using in the future. The Administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal.

"I had no further briefings on the techniques. Several months later, my successor as Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman, was briefed more extensively and advised the techniques had in fact been employed. It was my understanding at that time that Congresswoman Harman filed a letter in early 2003 to the CIA to protest the use of such techniques, a protest with which I concurred."

# # #


The following, derived from commentary on the comments thread of the original story here at Big Brass Blog, is the writer's rebuttal:

First, let's go with Rep. Pelosi's statement: "The Administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal."

She saw the techniques for herself, including what by any legal standard is torture, and she is now claiming that, because counsel for those conducting and supporting the torture told her it was legal, she is not culpable.

That dog don't bark; that dog don't even whimper.

Absolutely not. She says she was briefed; her defense of her legislative conduct subsequently is thus: CIA lawyers, supported by John "Geneva Is Quaint" Yoo at Justice, told her they were doing legal things.

Now, let's get to the beauty: "[M]y successor as Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman, was briefed more extensively..."

Caught and headed for the frying pan, Rep. Pelosi insists that the other furry creature is really the one we want for dinner.

And by the way, claiming she "...was briefed on interrogation techniques the Administration was considering using in the future" would make her a conspirator before the fact (were I to believe her now that she needs to spin what she seemed unable to recall until her enemies handed her her own two-faced backside). Conspiracy before the fact is considerably more serious than conspiracy after the fact.

The Dark Wraith wonders exactly who's handing these Democrats the shovel they're using so effectively to dig their own graves.


Technorati & Delicious tags · · · · · · · Delicious & Technorati tags

31 comments:

i read this this morning and i've been aghast. it might go some distance in explaining why the dems are so fucking spineless on the issue, complicity will do that to a person. they knew. they fucking knew and they went along with it. they need to go as bad as bush does now. a plague on all their houses.

this is not a dem or republican issue anymore. it is a moral imperitive. no torturers can be allowed positions of authority in our goverment.
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 09 Dec '07 - 22:49
from the WaPo article:

"...as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan)."

So, who do we vote for?
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 09 Dec '07 - 22:52
Notify the next of kin.
The masters of our so-called leaders have done their work well.

How soon, Wraith, will the overlords of the Earth be able to say,
"Well done, our good and faithful servants."
Me? I'm still holding out for either Oct. 28, 2011 or Dec. 21, 2012.
by: Peter of Lone Tree (contact) - 09 Dec '07 - 23:01
Foiled Goil, Cynthia McKinney might be running on the Green Party ticket.
by: Peter of Lone Tree (contact) - 09 Dec '07 - 23:02
And, the Green Party's chances are... ?
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 09 Dec '07 - 23:03
Sometimes, war is not about the overwhelming enemy you cannot destroy; it's about the faithless ally you can punish. And occasionally, the ally you support is most assuredly to be destroyed: Pawns are often worth far more in sacrifice than they are while they're in the way.

As far as the Democrats are concerned, cowards crawl to those with the greatest power.

Demonstrate power, and the craven will crawl to you; reserve that power, and they will crawl to your enemy who, unlike you, has no reserve in its action and no shame in its strength.

A scorched earth makes for a much clearer battlefield.

The Dark Wraith is just thrilled that the Dems have given him such reason for cynicism.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 09 Dec '07 - 23:17
4 then let the scorching begin. i am now officially among the no goddamned incumbents wing. if they've had a job in government over the last eight years, it's time to go. out. with. them. all.
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 00:18
cynicism is my body's natural defense against stupid.
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 00:19
I gots me a new broom, metaphorically speaking. It's a BIG damn broom...and you know what they say about new brooms and sweeping clean...
Shall we have a sweeping party? I'll bring refreshments...if somebody will bring the shovels and pickup trucks....

Well, there WILL be a lot of...er...dirt that needs shifted...
by: tali (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 00:25
All I have are some pitchforks.

Oh, yes. I have torches, too.

The Dark Wraith will see if he has some Open Pit barbecue sauce, too.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 00:43
It gives me no pleasure to be right. The Demowienies are the Democonspirators.
by: Deb (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 00:51
There is something that troubles me about just who these "official sources" are, cited in the WaPo. Especially considering the committee was sworn to secrecy. A couple examples:

"Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing," said Goss, who chaired the House intelligence committee from 1997 to 2004 and then served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006.

and

Congressional officials say the groups' ability to challenge the practices was hampered by strict rules of secrecy that prohibited them from being able to take notes or consult legal experts or members of their own staffs. And while various officials have described the briefings as detailed and graphic, it is unclear precisely what members were told about waterboarding and how it is conducted.

It's late, and I'm too tired to think more on it… but at the moment I'm thinking: "Fish on!"

Red herring, anyone?
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 02:23
Not this time, Foiled Goil.

No denials; just silence to buy spin-weaving time. Rumors about these kinds of "access" meet-ups to make key Democrats feel special have been swirling for a long time. Peloso & Co. aren't the only ones who have "access" rumors against them: Hillary Clinton supposedly was given special meetings so she'd "understand" how much of a "terrorist" threat the Qods Force really is, and that's why she voted to hand Bush what he could eventually construe—despite her admonition that he dare not—as authorization for military action against Iran.

This is a game like many other Republican games. The Republicans are good at it. That's because it's their game. The Democrats are paying the price to this very day for Machiavellian maneuvering the Republicans played out for years and still are with brilliant, if pedantic, parliamentary procedures that "thwart" the will of the Democratic majority in Congress.

I have an old saying: The best way to beat your enemy is to buy him a really nice hooker. And make sure you get pictures to send to his wife.

...if he doesn't do what you want, that is.

The Dark Wraith might just be a cynical old bitch, of course.
[But that doesn't mean I'm not right.]
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 02:37
Blackdog's tail is held low.
by: blackdog (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 04:14
"And, the Green Party's chances are... ?"

About as good as the American people's.
by: Peter of Lone Tree (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 07:57
When the story first broke on the NIE, that senior analysts were willing to risk jail by going to the press if Bush/Cheney tried to hide it, this comment was posted at Think Progress:

Good for those REAL Patriots in the CIA.

As for the rest of D.C. ::

Put their heads on pikes…

and I mean that in the cheeriest sense of holiday spirits !!!

pikes wrapped in tinsel.


Have a holly jolly Christmas...!!
by: trog69 (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 08:05
Oopsy...that was by overlap here.
by: trog69 (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 08:07
Good day, Dark Wraith.

Thank you for reminding me that one should never underestimate the power of termites.
by: Ms. Mule (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 09:12
Indeed, Ms. Mule, and as a consequence, one should never overestimate the reliability of wooden bridges to a better tomorrow.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 10:48
Press Releases

12/09/2007

Pelosi Statement on Washington Post Report on Congressional
Briefing of Administration Interrogation Techniques


"On one occasion, in the fall of 2002, I was briefed on interrogation techniques the Administration was considering using in the future. The Administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal.

"I had no further briefings on the techniques. Several months later, my successor as Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman, was briefed more extensively and advised the techniques had in fact been employed. It was my understanding at that time that Congresswoman Harman filed a letter in early 2003 to the CIA to protest the use of such techniques, a protest with which I concurred."
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 15:00
Good afternoon, Foiled Goil.

First, let's go with Rep. Pelosi's statement: "The Administration advised that legal counsel for the both the CIA and the Department of Justice had concluded that the techniques were legal."

She saw the techniques for herself, including what by any legal standard is torture, and she is now claiming that, because counsel for those conducting and supporting the torture told her it was legal, she is not culpable.

That dog don't bark; that dog don't even whimper.

Absolutely not. She says she was briefed; her defense of her legislative conduct subsequently is thus: CIA lawyers, supported by John "Geneva Is Quaint" Yoo at Justice, told her they were doing legal things.

Now, let's get to the beauty: "[M]y successor as Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee, Jane Harman, was briefed more extensively..."

Caught and headed for the frying pan, Rep. Pelosi insists that the other furry creature is really the one we want for dinner.

Here's the thing: I'm hungry; they're both in the pan; and I've got enough sauce to make them both mouth-watering on the dinner table.

And by the way, claiming she "...was briefed on interrogation techniques the Administration was considering using in the future" would make her a conspirator before the fact (were I to believe her now that she needs to spin what she seemed unable to recall until her enemies handed her her own two-faced backside). Conspiracy before the fact is considerably more serious than conspiracy after the fact.

The Dark Wraith wonders exactly who's handing these Democrats the shovel they're using so effectively to dig their own graves.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 15:29
if they were briefed, and they said nothing, not even asking "are you sure?" when told by the bright legal lights that these were legal techniques, they are supporters. a maxim of law from the time of cicero is qui tacet consentere (silence gives consent). if you say nothing, you say "okie dokie pokey."

she can't weasel, spin, or parse her way out of it. she knew, she saw, she went the fuck along.

pelosi must go. i've sent email and snail mail to her office saying she needs to resign as speaker.
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 16:07
Here is the take on the sordid mess at BTC News, which goes along with my comment about the use of "access" not only to compromise key opposition elements, but also to give them a sense of specialness. It's the same technique the Pentagon has been using by embedding reporters with combat units and by taking select Congressmen on special tours of Iraq.

Included in the BTC News story, by the way, is a repudiation of Aravosis's defense of Pelosi.

As an important note, here, I am fully mindful that the more-than-vague hints of some ugly, fratricidal battle lines are being drawn. This is, of course, what the neo-cons wanted.

More importantly, this is what the progressives have needed for many years.

More fuel is coming, by the way. The neo-cons have ammunition in reserve. The question becomes thus: Is it better to go down with fickle allies, or is it wiser to let the neo-cons do the work of culling the herd?

The Dark Wraith always did prefer to have someone else field dress the game.
[Just call me when the steaks are ready.]
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 16:58
I understand what you all are saying. It still just doesn't set well with me, since we've all been spun so much since 2000. Considering Porter Goss and other unnamed "officials" have given this information to the press, just after the news of the tape erasures, it seems a little too coincidental to me. But I "hear" you.
by: Foiled Goil (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 17:17
Good evening, Foiled Goil.

As always, I appreciate your perspective.

To the point at hand, the lesson from the movie Blade Runner is most relevant. As brutally, cruelly detached when killing as all the Replicants were, only two survived: Unlike the others—unlike even Batty, who could kill his maker—Deckard and Rachael could kill their own.

The Dark Wraith wonders if people who saw the movie noticed that.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 17:32
yeah, wraith i saw that. in the searing film american me about the forming of the mexican prison gang "la eme" (or the mexican mafia) they brought out that same point. what set them apart from the other gangs both in reputation and history of ruthlessness was their willingness to kill their own.

i shudder to think if that becomes a survival skill in our society.
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 21:17
This explains the idea to "table the impeachment" and the Rovian evidence that was hung over the heads of the Democrats.

We now know why the Dems had no balls; they were being blackmailed and now the blackmailer is using his last trump.

Had to be a set up by Karl. Thinking in advance.
by: Father Tyme (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 22:23
Actually, Father Tyme, the Bush folks have a couple more trumps.

Then again, I don't want Time magazine calling me a 'conspiracy theorist'.

The Dark Wraith is pretty fragile about that kind of name calling, y'know.
by: Dark Wraith (contact) - 10 Dec '07 - 22:53
Just a note, the full phrase is
qui tacet consentire videtur
"whosoever is silent is seen to consent".

Cloud likes to bring language into discussion whenever possible.
by: Cloud (contact) - 11 Dec '07 - 08:34
DW,
Sometimes subtlety ISN'T wasted on the stupid.
by: Father Tyme (contact) - 11 Dec '07 - 09:32
thank you cloud. rthy
by: Minstrel Boy (contact) - 11 Dec '07 - 10:03



This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it
«Return to the Main Page of Big Brass Blog

Meta Information:

Title: Key Democrats Knew, Did Not Object to U.S. Torture Policy
Date posted: 09 Dec '07 - 21:55
No Trackbacks
Filed under: Editorial
Good Karma: 3 (vote)
Bad Karma: 0 (vote)
Next entry: » A Yearly Gripe
Previous entry: « Republican Obstructionists

Frontpage
:
:

Navigation

  Today
  Archives
  Contact

Calendar

Search


Blog Headlines

Advertisements

Dark Wraith's Bookstore

♦           ♦           ♦
Free Sound Effects
Download Free Sound Effects from AudioMicro.
♦           ♦           ♦

News

Diversions

In the News

Quote of the Day